Pennsylvania school forces boy to “tolerate” undressing in front of transgender

Pennsylvania school forces boy to “tolerate” undressing in front of transgender

Tuesday, March 28, 2017 by: JD Heyes

Tags: Gender identity, policies, Privacy rights, public school

2,470Views

Image: Pennsylvania school forces boy to “tolerate” undressing in front of transgender

(Natural News) Liberal hypocrisy is destroying American culture, point blank. This is just another example of how.

Far-Left Democratic politicians, especially, claim to have cornered the market on “compassion” for children. No one cares more about them than they do, and it’s those “evil” Republicans who want to starve children, deny them health care, use and abuse them and take away their basic humanity.

None of that is true, mind you, but the hypocrisy of those claims made by Democratic politicians is staggering, since the Democratic Party is the party of cultural decay.

Case in point: As noted by Fox News columnist Todd Starnes, a school in Pennsylvania is forcing a teenage boy to “tolerate’ having to undress in front of a physiological female who is “identifying” as being another boy.

She’s not, plain and simple, but to a liberal, that factoid doesn’t matter. So much for “protecting our children.” (RELATED: Watch: Tucker Carlson Crush Liberal Lunatic Over Anti-Science “Transgender Nonsense”.)

Starnes notes:

A teenage boy was told by school leaders that he had to “tolerate” undressing in front of a female student and to make it as “natural” as possible, according to a blockbuster lawsuit filed in a Pennsylvania district court.

The suit, filed by the Alliance Defending Freedom and Independence Law Center, alleges that officials at the Boyertown Area School District essentially shamed the boy into doing something he otherwise would not have done, while violating his personal rights to privacy. In addition, the suit alleges sexual harassment.

“No school should rob any student of this legally protected personal privacy,” said ILC lawyer Randall Wenger. “We trust that our children won’t be forced into emotionally vulnerable situations like this when they are in the care of our schools because it’s a school’s duty to protect and respect the bodily privacy and dignity of all students.”

Not just students chosen by the school PC police.

Starnes notes further that last fall, “Joel Doe” was standing in a locker room in his undergarment in the process of changing for gym class. The suit states, “He suddenly realized there was a member of the opposite sex changing with him in the locker room, who was at the time, wearing nothing but shorts and a bra.”

The teen, along with several other classmates, told the school’s assistant principal, who has been named as a defendant in the suit.

“Dr. Foley indicated that the legality was up in the air but that students who mentally identify themselves with the opposite sex could choose the locker room and bathroom to use, and physical sex did not matter,” says the suit.

Except that it does matter – it’s always mattered.

When the teen boy asked the assistant principal if the school could do something to protect his privacy, he was told, allegedly to “tolerate” it and make the situation as “natural” as possible.

What’s even worse, Starnes notes, is that the boy’s parents weren’t even told about the school district’s policy of allowing those who “identify” as another sex into the formerly private areas of school – locker rooms and bathrooms, mostly.

“The District’s directive to Joel Doe was that he must change with students of the opposite sex, and make it as natural as possible, and that anything less would be intolerant and bullying against students who profess a gender identity with the opposite sex,” says the suit. (RELATED: Loopy liberals now trying to say the definition of a ‘woman’ is merely a decision not rooted in biological reality.)

This idiocy started under Obama and it continues today, though President Donald Trump has reversed the policy, throwing the issue back to states. But it was stupid policy then, it’s stupid policy now, and it’ll always be stupid policy, because it violates the privacy rights of 99.99 percent of kids while deferring to the .01 percent of them, making the tiny minority of students the only ones afforded full rights.

There are two sexes among human beings – not 20 – male and female. And while the medical technology exists today to allow a person to physically change the outward appearance, unless or until that happens, students and adults should be made to use private facilities according to their actual gender. Enough of the lunacy, already.

Find more stories on gender and culture at Gender.news.

J.D. Heyes is a senior writer for NaturalNews.com and NewsTarget.com, as well as editor of The National Sentinel.

Sources:

Reuters.com

FoxNews.com

Stupid.news